Part 3 – Three opinion pieces in the AJC – Meria Carstarphen, Ed Johnson and Maureen Downey

The Atlanta Journal Constitution published three opinion pieces today and the authors include Atlanta Public School Superintendent Meria Carstarphen, business consultant and former Board of Education candidate Ed Johnson and AJC Get Schooled blog author Maureen Downey. All three are a must read in their entirety as APS is about to start a new school year this coming Monday, August 4th.

The following is part three of a three part series (see part 1 here and part 2 here) and contains some excerpts from Maureen Downey’s article titled “A new chapter for APS” (behind pay wall):

While it matters what Carstarphen does, it matters more what she enables her principals and teachers to do.

Her job is more than recruiting top principals and teachers; she has to ensure they’re trained to succeed in urban classrooms by providing them with the ongoing support necessary to deal with the challenges.

Carstarphen’s choice for her deputy, David Jernigan, can help. Jernigan comes to APS from KIPP Metro Atlanta where he oversaw eight KIPP schools… KIPP relies on strong school leaders who are carefully selected, trained and then freed to direct, manage and staff their campuses.

It’s essential the school board, parents and the business community recognize that improvements will not come easily or quickly… As Stanford education emeritus professor Larry Cuban has said, “Turning around a failing company or a school district is no work for sprinters, it is marathoners who refashion the company and district into successes.”

Atlanta educates a lot of poor children. Although 76 percent of APS students are on free and reduced lunch, the district doesn’t have an impressive track record with low-income students….

… 13 of Atlanta’s 58 elementary schools ranked among the bottom 5 percent in Georgia…Clayton County enrolls the same number of students as Atlanta and has even greater poverty. Yet, only two of Clayton’s 39 elementary schools were in the bottom 5 percent.

Carstarphen has to get her most effective teachers into her least successful schools….And she has to untangle the central office thicket that provides camouflage for needless bureaucracy. She has to either find or develop more principals in the mold of Stephanie Johnson at Maynard Jackson High School and Betsy Bockman at Inman Middle.

If Carstarphen can do all that, the Atlanta school board won’t be alone in singing her praises.

While the prior two posts on the opinions of Carstarphen and Johnson focused on building on existing APS strengths, Downey gets to the core issue – building a strong team of teachers and in-school leaders who will be responsible for achieving transformational results. As Downey notes, some gems already exist within the system and the new leadership has a track record of success.

My sense is that Ed Johnson’s prescription to Carstarphen of providing “servant leadership” that turns the leadership pyramid upside down with student educational outcomes at the top of the hierarchy is the right idea. Carstarphen seems committed to doing this – will she and her team be able to deliver?

My bet is that she can – but she will have to transform a system that has been focused on what it could “not do” versus a system that “can do and will do”.

[Follow me on Twitter @Financial_Decon & Facebook]

2 Responses to Part 3 – Three opinion pieces in the AJC – Meria Carstarphen, Ed Johnson and Maureen Downey

  1. Jack hassard says:

    Reblogged this on The Art of Teaching Science and commented:
    Robert Stockwell has summarized three brief articles published today on the AJC focusing on the opening of the APS 2015 – 2015 academic year. I was especially pleased to see that the AJC published the article by Ed Johnson, who has much to say about system transformation.

  2. Beverly Fraud says:

    “While it matters what Carstarphen does, it matters more what she enables her principals and teachers to do.”

    And is there a policy in place that will protect teachers who advocate for their students from administrative RETALIATION? (Which was an essential part of the “APS playbook” when it conducted academic genocide for the better part of a decade.)

    Has Carstarphen or the board even DISCUSSED the issue?

    When this issue gets discussed, you then you will have your evidence that Carstarphen REALLY wants to “empower teachers.”

    How can you even BEGIN to claim you want “servant leadership” if you don’t empower those who are most directly responsible for student success with the freedom to speak?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: